Urban Legends - Nessie, The Loch Ness Monster
If you
follow my blog, you’re now probably saying “What took you so long?”. And you’re
right. This time I’m going to talk about the most mysterious and wonderful
legend of all time: The Loch Ness Monster (Nessie for friends) and who started
this myth. First of all, let’s start with a little bit of geography. Loch Ness
is a long, narrow lake localized in the southwest of Inverness, a city in the
Scottish Highlands. It is the second largest in Scotland by surface area (holds
more water than all of the other lakes in Great Britain combined)and the
largest by volume. It is also the second deepest loch, at an astounding 755
feet (230 meters) at its deepest point. In fact, because of its depth, Loch Ness
doesn’t freeze. Most of the water stays at a steady temperature of about 44
degrees Fahrenheit. Only the top 100 feet or so varies in temperature, but with
so much warmer water beneath keeping things relatively hot, you’ll not get a
chance to ice skate on it. The water is dark and murky due to the high levels
of turf in the surrounding soil. The breadth, depth, and low visibility of this
particular loch make a prime environment for people’s imagination to run wild,
particularly when other lake monsters were plentiful in Scottish legends
(thirteen in total).
The first
recorded sighting of Nessie, even if this should be considered more as a
legend, was in 565 A.D. by Saint Columba, an Irish missionary praised for
spreading Christianity in Scotland. Once in the Highlands, he ran across a
group of people burying a man who had been bitten by the monster in the River
Ness. The Saint supposedly asked another man to swim across the river. When the
man jumped in, the monster rose from the depths and Saint Columba, invoking God’s
power, banished it at the end of the river course. The story was written nearly
a century after the supposed encounter; but even so, it remains a popular proof
used to demonstrate Nessie’s existence.
The next
recorded sighting happened over 1300 years later, in 1933. George Spicer was
out driving with his wife when he saw a large creature, walking in front of
their car near the loch. The creature, according to Spicer description, had a
huge body, long neck, and they couldn’t see any limbs before it lunged toward
the Loch Ness. A few weeks later, a motorcyclist claimed to have nearly run
into a similar creature, describing it as a type of plesiosaur -a prehistoric
marine creature with four large fins and a long neck- fitting the Spicers’
description. Soon, with the building of a road along the loch’s coast, many
more reports of sightings of the monster flooded in.
The huge
amount of sightings in 1933, can be considered as the beginning of a long,
fruitless search for the monster. The first picture taken of the monster was in
November 1933 by Hugh Gray. He supposedly saw a large creature rise above the
surface of the water and snapped several photographs before it disappeared, but
only one photo turned out when developed. The picture shows a creature with a
long neck and a thick body, with four lumps at its side which might have been
flippers. However, it should be noted that critics claim that the photo represents
nothing more of a dog swimming with a stick in its mouth… not remotely
frightening.
Later that
year, a man named Marmaduke Wetherell, a well-known big game hunter, was hired
by the Daily Mail to find evidence of the Loch Ness Monster. He later found
large tracks on the edge of the lake and made molds, but the Natural History
Museum examined them and said they were likely from a dried hippo’s foot which
had become popularly used as umbrella stands. Wetherell was fired for failing
to find any substantial evidence.
On April
21, 1934, the most famous picture of the monster was published in the Daily
Mail. The picture was supposedly taken by a doctor named Robert Kenneth Wilson,
but he didn’t like having his name associated with the photo so it became known
as the “Surgeon’s Photograph.” (left) The picture shows, from a distance, the long
neck and head of the monster rising from rippling water. The picture is
convincing to the untrained eye, though critics, certain the photo was a hoax,
claimed it was everything from an elephant to a diving bird.
Well, If
you think the photo is real, I’m afraid I have to disappoint you. It turns out
the photo was a fake. In 1994, Christopher Spurling, the stepson of Marmaduke
Wetherell, admitted to being involved in creating a model of Nessie’s neck and
head and placing it on a toy submarine. The pair then took the model to Loch
Ness and took photos of it in the water. Wilson was then given the photos
because he was a trusted man, being a doctor. Wetherell was said to have come
up with this cheating plan because he was humiliated by his previous attempt at
finding the monster.
So it’s
very difficult to understand which one can be a “real” photo of the monster. Many other searches have taken place to find
the monster than those already listed. In 1934, twenty men sat at various
locations around the loch with binoculars and cameras in the Sir Edward
Mountain Expedition. They remained there from 9 am to 6 pm every day for five
weeks. 21 pictures were taken and examined, but they were thought to be of
seals.
Since the
very first photo, countless more pics, videos and eyewitness accounts have
emerged claiming to prove the existence of the Loch Ness Monster. But when
technology came in to help searchers, the secrets multiplied.
In 1954,
the first contact via sonar was made on Rival III, a fishing boat. 480 feet below
the boat, a large and strange object was seen keeping pace with the boat’s
speed. In 2011, sonar contact was made again by Marcus Atkinson who saw an
object about five feet long and 75 feet below the surface. It kept pace with
his boat for two minutes before it disappeared. The sonar image has been
examined and critics have dismissed it as an algae bloom. However, believers have said that algae
couldn’t survive at 75 feet as it needs sunlight to thrive, and as murky as the
waters of Loch Ness are, very little sunlight would reach so far below the
surface.
But a brave
adventurer didn’t give up. In the 70s and early 2000s, Robert Rines conducted a
number of underwater investigations hoping to find Nessie. His studies resulted
in several underwater photographs of possible fins and tails. (one of the photos on the right) However, in 2008
he claimed that, based on fewer sightings and sonar readings, Nessie had died
due to global warming.
The most recent photograph (on the left) was taken by George Edwards in November 2011. Edwards claimed that it is the most convincing photograph yet, which perhaps shouldn’t be too much of a surprise given advances in easy to use and readily accessible home photo editing software. However, in this case, even other Loch Ness Monster researchers have questioned the authenticity of the picture, saying the hump rising from the water in the picture is actually a fiberglass model that was used in the filming of a documentary by National Geographic, which Edwards had participated in. So another try to become famous using an old legend (and lots of subterfuges).
Amazing. Still not sure if i believe in it or not but these evidences can make you think.
ReplyDelete